References

Aczel, B., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A., Kovacs, M., Szaszi, B., Szecsi, P., Zrubka, M., Gronau, Q. F., Bergh, D. van den, & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2018). Quantifying support for the null hypothesis in psychology: An empirical investigation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918773742

Allard, A. (2018). Analytic-GRIMMER: A new way of testing the possibility of standard deviations. https://aurelienallard.netlify.app/post/anaytic-grimmer-possibility-standard-deviations/

Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1995). Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ, 311(7003), 485. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485

Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2005). Standard deviations and standard errors. BMJ, 331(7521), 903. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7521.903

Anaya, J. (2016). The GRIMMER test: A method for testing the validity of reported measures of variability. PeerJ Preprints. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2400v1

Armitage, P., McPherson, C. K., & Rowe, B. C. (1969). Repeated significance tests on accumulating data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 132(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343787

Badenes-Ribera, L., Frías-Navarro, D., Iotti, B., Bonilla-Campos, A., & Longobardi, C. (2016). Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian academic psychologists. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247

Badenes-Ribera, L., Frías-Navarro, D., Monterde-i-Bort, H., & Pascual-Soler, M. (2015). Interpretation of the p value: A national survey study in academic psychologists from Spain. Psicothema, 27(3), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.283

Bainbridge, T. F., Ludeke, S. G., & Smillie, L. D. (2022). Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000395

Barde, M. P., & Barde, P. J. (2012). What to use to express the variability of data: Standard deviation or standard error of mean? Perspectives in Clinical Research, 3(3), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.100662

Baron-Cohen, S., Bowen, D. C., Holt, R. J., Allison, C., Auyeung, B., Lombardo, M. V., Smith, P., & Lai, M.-C. (2015). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test: Complete absence of typical sex difference in  400 men and women with autism. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0136521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136521

Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2022). Z-curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. Meta-Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2021.2720

Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G. (2005). Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.389

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z

Bhatia, R., & Davis, C. (2000). A better bound on the variance. The American Mathematical Monthly, 107(4), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2000.12005203

Bishop, D. V. M., & Thompson, P. A. (2016). Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value. PeerJ, 4, Article e1715. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1715

Bogdan, P. C. (2025). One decade into the replication crisis, how have psychological results changed? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 8(2), Article 25152459251323480. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251323480

Brown, N. J. L. (2026). Brown’s Law. Personal communication to Ian Hussey.

Brown, N. J. L., & Heathers, J. A. J. (2017). The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673876

Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874

Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). p-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLOS ONE, 11(2), Article e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144

Brysbaert, M. (2024). Questioning the exclusive focus on the Hu and Bentler norms in factor analysis: Practice-oriented Likert scale indicators based on an analysis of 161 datasets. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m72w8

Bürkner, P.-C., & Vuorre, M. (2019). Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199

Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072

Cochrane. (n.d.-a). Cochrane database of systematic reviews: Editorial policies. Cochrane Library. Retrieved https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/editorial-policies

Cochrane. (n.d.-b). Policy for managing potentially problematic studies: Implementation guidance. Cochrane Library editorial policy. Retrieved https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/editorial-policies/problematic-studies-implementation-guidance

Cochrane. (2025). Methods in Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/methods-cochrane

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997

Cox, D. R. (2006). Principles of statistical inference. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813559

Cumming, G. (2008). Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x

Elk, M. van, & Fried, E. I. (2023). History repeating: Guidelines to address common problems in psychedelic science. Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology, 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231198466

Erdfelder, E., & Heck, D. W. (2019). Detecting evidential value and p-hacking with the p-curve tool: A word of caution. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000383

Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard: The amazing persistence of a probabilistic misconception. Theory & Psychology, 5(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395051004

Ferrari, S., & Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501

Francis, G. (2014). The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1180–1187. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0601-x

Francis, G. (2016). Confirming the appearance of excess success: Reply to van Boxtel and Koch (2016). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 2010–2013. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1137-z

Francis, G., Tanzman, J., & Matthews, W. J. (2014). Excess success for psychology articles in the journal Science. PLOS ONE, 9(12), Article e114255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114255

Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484

Gallardo-Gómez, D., Richardson, R., & Dwan, K. (2024). Standardized mean differences in meta-analysis: A tutorial. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, 2(3), e12047. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12047

García-Pérez, M. A., & Alcalá-Quintana, R. (2016). The interpretation of scholars’ interpretations of confidence intervals: Criticism, replication, and extension of Hoekstra et al. (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01042

Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649

Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033

Gigerenzer, G. (2018). Statistical rituals: The replication delusion and how we got there. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771329

Goodman, S. N. (1992). A comment on replication, p-values and evidence. Statistics in Medicine, 11(7), 875–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780110705

Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., & Pfeiffer, T. (2021). Predicting replicability—Analysis of survey and prediction market data from large-scale forecasting projects. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0248780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248780

Greenberg, S. A. (2009). How citation distortions create unfounded authority: Analysis of a citation network. BMJ, 339, b2680. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2680

Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3

Haller, H., & Krauss, S. (2002). Misinterpretations of significance: A problem students share with their teachers? Methods of Psychological Research Online, 7(1), 1–20. https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/34338/

Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: What is going on? PeerJ, 4, Article e1935. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1935

Hauer, E. (2004). The harm done by tests of significance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(3), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00036-8

Heathers, J. A. J. (2024). Approximately 1 in 7 scientific papers are fake. https://osf.io/5rf2m/

Heathers, J. A. J., & Grimes, D. R. (2025). GRIM-U: A GRIM-like observation to establish impossible p values from ranked tests (1). Medical Evidence Project. https://medicalevidenceproject.org/grim-u-observation-establish-impossible-p-values-ranked-tests/

Hussey, I. (2026a). Analyticgrimu: Granularity testing for Mann-Whitney U-test reported results. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21434617

Hussey, I. (2026b). Strait: Bounds checks for reported summary statistics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21439905

Hussey, I., Alsalti, T., Bosco, F., Elson, M., & Arslan, R. C. (2025). An aberrant abundance of Cronbach’s alpha values at .70. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 8(1), Article 25152459241287123. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241287123

Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials, 4(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774507079441

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6

Jung, L. (2026). Scrutiny: Error detection in science. https://github.com/lhdjung/scrutiny

Kadlec, D., Sainani, K. L., & Nimphius, S. (2023). With great power comes great responsibility: Common errors in meta-analyses and meta-regressions in strength & conditioning research. Sports Medicine, 53(2), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01766-0

Kanellopoulou, A., Evrenoglou, T., Metelli, S., & Chaimani, A. (2025). Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: A tutorial. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, 3(5), e70013. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70013

Ko, W.-R., Hung, W.-T., Chang, H.-C., & Lin, L.-Y. (2014). Inappropriate use of standard error of the mean when reporting variability of study samples: A critical evaluation of four selected journals of obstetrics and gynecology. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 53(1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2013.04.035

Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-00477-2

Kubinec, R. (2023). Ordered beta regression: A parsimonious, well-fitting model for continuous data with lower and upper bounds. Political Analysis, 31(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.20

Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023

Lakens, D. (2015). On the challenges of drawing conclusions from p-values just below 0.05. PeerJ, 3, Article e1142. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1142

Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177

Lakens, D. (2022). Improving your statistical inferences (Version 1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6409077

Lakens, D., Adolfi, F. G., Albers, C. J., Anvari, F., Apps, M. A. J., Argamon, S. E., Baguley, T., Becker, R. B., Benning, S. D., Bradford, D. E., Buchanan, E. M., Caldwell, A. R., Van Calster, B., Carlsson, R., Chen, S.-C., Chung, B., Colling, L. J., Collins, G. S., Crook, Z., … Zwaan, R. A. (2018). Justify your alpha. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(3), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x

Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and nonsignificant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693058

Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963

Leggett, N. C., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2013). The life of p: "Just significant" results are on the rise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2303–2309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.863371

Liddell, T. M., & Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009

Lyu, X.-K., Xu, Y., Zhao, X.-F., Zuo, X.-N., & Hu, C.-P. (2020). Beyond psychology: Prevalence of p value and confidence interval misinterpretation across different fields. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, Article e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.28

Lyu, Z., Peng, K., & Hu, C.-P. (2018). P-value, confidence intervals, and statistical inference: A new dataset of misinterpretation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00868

Masicampo, E. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(11), 2271–2279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.711335

McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429029608

McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis: An evaluation of selection methods and some cautionary notes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662243

McShane, B. B., & Gal, D. (2017). Statistical significance and the dichotomization of evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112(519), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1289846

Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2016). Interpreting confidence intervals: A comment on Hoekstra, Morey, Rouder, and Wagenmakers (2014). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0859-7

Moran, T., Hughes, S., Hussey, I., et al. (2021). Incidental attitude formation via the surveillance task: A preregistered replication of the Olson and Fazio (2001) study. Psychological Science, 32(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620968526

Morey, R. D., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2026). On the poor statistical properties of the P-curve meta-analytic procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 121(553), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2025.2544397

Morey, R. D., & Lakens, D. (2016). Why most of psychology is statistically unfalsifiable. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.838685

Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.164

Murphy, S. L., Merz, R., Reimann, L.-E., & Fernández, A. (2025). Nonsignificance misinterpreted as an effect’s absence in psychology: Prevalence and temporal analyses. Royal Society Open Science, 12(3), 242167. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.242167

Nagele, P. (2003). Misuse of standard error of the mean (SEM) when reporting variability of a sample: A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 90(4), 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg087

Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886

Nuijten, M. B., & Epskamp, S. (2025). Statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p-values. https://github.com/MicheleNuijten/statcheck

Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2

Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioural sciences. Wiley.

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

Olsson-Collentine, A., van Assen, M. A. L. M., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2019). The prevalence of marginally significant results in psychology over time. Psychological Science, 30(4), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619830326

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Ospina, R., & Ferrari, S. L. P. (2012). A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56(6), 1609–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.10.005

Otte, W. M., Vinkers, C. H., Habets, P. C., van IJzendoorn, D. G. P., & Tijdink, J. K. (2022). Analysis of 567,758 randomized controlled trials published over 30 years reveals trends in phrases used to discuss results that do not reach statistical significance. PLOS Biology, 20(2), Article e3001562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001562

Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H., Andrade, K. C., Novaes, M. M., Pessoa, J. A., Mota-Rolim, S. A., Osório, F. L., Sanches, R., Santos, R. G. dos, Tófoli, L. F., Oliveira Silveira, G. de, Yonamine, M., Riba, J., Santos, F. R., Silva-Junior, A. A., Alchieri, J. C., Galvão-Coelho, N. L., Lobão-Soares, B., … Araújo, D. B. (2019). Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 49(4), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001356

Pek, J., Wu, H., Liu, Y., Dusenbery, K. J., & Wegener, D. T. (2026). What does a Z-curve analysis tell us? Cognition and Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2613139

Plöderl, M., Horowitz, M. A., & Hengartner, M. P. (2023). Re: “A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder” by Strawn et al.—Concerning harm–benefit ratio in a recent trial about escitalopram for generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 33(7), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2023.0029

Preusser, D. F., Leaf, W. A., DeBartolo, K. B., Blomberg, R. D., & Levy, M. M. (1982). The effect of right-turn-on-red on pedestrian and bicyclist accidents. Journal of Safety Research, 13(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(82)90001-9

Pritschet, L., Powell, D., & Horne, Z. (2016). Marginally significant effects as evidence for hypotheses: Changing attitudes over four decades. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645672

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276

Sandercock, G. R. H. (2024). The standard error/standard deviation mix-up: Potential impacts on meta-analyses in sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 54(6), 1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01989-9

Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. R. M. J., & Lakens, D. (2021). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard psychology literature with Registered Reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), Article 25152459211007467. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467

Schimmack, U. (2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029487

Schimmack, U., & Soto, M. D. (2026). A response to Pek et al.’s commentary on Z-curve: Clarifying the assumptions of selection models. Cognition and Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2678998

Schmidt, T. (2017). Sources of false positives and false negatives in the STATCHECK algorithm: Reply to Nuijten et al. (2016). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.01010

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014a). p-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014b). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242

Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1146–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000104

Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54

Stefan, A. M., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2023). Big little lies: A compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies. Royal Society Open Science, 10(2), Article 220346. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220346

Sterling, T. D. (1959). Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance—or vice versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54(285), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497

Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768

Strawn, J. R., Moldauer, L., Hahn, R. D., Wise, A., Bertzos, K., Eisenberg, B., Greenberg, E., Liu, C., Gopalkrishnan, M., McVoy, M., & Knutson, J. A. (2023). A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 33(3), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2023.0004

Travis, K. (2026). Written testimony of Kate Travis, managing editor, Retraction Watch, for the hearing titled “The State of Scientific Publishing: Assessing Trends, Emerging Issues, and Policy Considerations”. Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives. https://republicans-science.house.gov/_cache/files/8/8/8893b8d8-cce4-46ac-b43a-42f2407587b8/C065DE0F54E66B2C273BB4CE31899F1B3EC2FEC433F320AE7B03D8E6DE1112A8.ms.-kate-travis-testimony.pdf

Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2015). p-hacking by post hoc selection with multiple opportunities: Detectability by skewness test? Comment on Simonsohn, Nelson, and Simmons (2014). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000086

van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Conducting meta-analyses based on p values: Reservations and recommendations for applying p-uniform and p-curve. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650874

van Boxtel, J. J. A., & Koch, C. (2016). Reevaluating excess success in psychological science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1602–1606. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1010-0

Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Wagenmakers, E.-J., Beek, T., Dijkhoff, L., Gronau, Q. F., Acosta, A., Adams, R. B., Albohn, D. N., Allard, E. S., Benning, S. D., Blouin-Hudon, E.-M., et al. (2016). Registered replication report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616674458

Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

Wilkinson, J., Bero, L., Heal, C., Flemyng, E., Antoniou, G. A., Aburrow, T., Alfirevic, Z., Avenell, A., Barbour, V., Berghella, V., Bishop, D. V. M., Bordewijk, E. M., Brown, N. J. L., Christopher, J., Clarke, M., Dahly, D., Dennis, J., Dicker, P., Dumville, J., … Kirkham, J. J. (2026). INSPECT-SR tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 394, e100611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-100611

Wilkinson, N. M., Kiessling, J., & Gredebäck, G. (2025). Is there an innate face detection module in the human newborn? A systematic review, meta-analysis and theoretical examination of the newborn face preference and its implications [Unpublished manuscript].

Wullschleger, M., Aghlmandi, S., Egger, M., & Zwahlen, M. (2014). High incorrect use of the standard error of the mean (SEM) in original articles in three cardiovascular journals evaluated for 2012. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e110364. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110364

Zee, T. van der, Anaya, J., & Brown, N. J. L. (2017). Statistical heartburn: An attempt to digest four pizza publications from the Cornell Food and Brand Lab. BMC Nutrition, 3(1), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-017-0167-x