17  Organising critique ✎ Very rough draft

17.1 What to do in what order

  • Valuing your time
  • Prioritising the most informative checks

17.2 Critiquing what matters

  • Critique as awareness raising / confrontation of hubris

17.3 Meta-science findings should not be anonymised

  • The case for transparency in identifying problematic work

17.4 Communicating critique

  • Communication pathways to elicit correction of the scientific record and scientific belief

17.5 Dealing with common responses

  • “Do the numbers matter?”
  • Sometimes people are accused of not having the expertise/credentials to critique, but no-one needs credentials to cite
  • “No critique, only cite”